Without Food there is no Life. Without good food there is no quality of Life!
Big Pharma Greed
Political Corruption
Politics and corruption of our systems has developed over the last century. With the realization of health benefits of a proper diet, profiteers have taken over the medical profession, promoting the products of Big Pharma and also changing the food industry to promote illness thereby increasing profits for Big Pharma.
Death rates and the discovery of new diseases has increased in a direct proportion to the decease in nutritional value of our food stuffs.
Farming practices have changed dramatically since the 50's. Here in the US we have gone from 4th in the world for life expectancy down to 49th, directly because of Big Pharma's political conniving. The evidence of the corrupt take over of healthcare is so overwhelming it is hard to find a place to start.
We live in an age where the pharmaceutical industry markets their products by purposely changing our food to be less nutritious in order to promote chemical intervention rather than pursue prevention. As a result of the deprivation of nutrients we have more incidents of all illness and continue to discover more illnesses.
The Greed in Medicine
The singular greatest secular atrocity committed against mankind is the pharmaceutical industry. Not only has this industry taken over the medical profession clandestinely but every natural cure found and discovered in the last 50 years by Big Pharma has been buried if they are unable to replicate the effects in a patentable synthetic.
The insidious nature of these actions of destroying evidence of natural remedies is only exceeded by the billions of dollars spent by Big Pharma to lobby against legitimate health activities. Big Pharma’s activities to restrict actual beneficial natural remedies goes even to a proactive level of purposely diminishing nutrient values in our food supply.
In the 1920’s Iodine reinforcement was successfully introduced into our diets with very positive results. Big Pharma however saw this as a threat to profits and successfully contrived and lobbied for the removal of iodine and the introduction of Bromine, a carcinogen, into Flour production that actually has the effect of crippling the thyroid function.
It is no coincidence that the major investments had by Big Pharma are in the area of food production. As the owners of Monsanto and other Food companies, Big Pharma has written the story line behind the production of GMO. The supposed reason for GMO’s is to enable more yield, when in fact GMO’s are patentable and therefore a money maker, but they also have detrimental impact on health thereby making Pharmaceuticals more used.
The medical industry often is willing to overlook Big Pharma’s flaws based upon the misconception of mingling the advancements in technologies such as surgical and testing procedures that have advanced amazingly. The sad part is they are not connected scientifically though they may be financially. The other sad news is that if Medical profession had kept up to the standards of care in the 40’s, 50’s, and 60’s where prevention was placed ahead of profits the need for so many hospitals and major facilities would not be needed.
Health care has become a vicious circle to where health care costs are driven higher by the same negligence in prevention that is making profits which increase, where health is impeded by the very industry that should be about doing what is right instead of the promotion of chemicals for profits. And it is the lack of the promotion of prevention that drives the need for the miracles of surgery.
The avarice and greed of Big Pharma is consuming us as the narrative of greed and complacency in the political realm gladly bows to the dollars Big Pharma provides.
Sadly the solution entails teaching responsibility. The food you ingest does impact your DNA and the genetic function of our children. So yes you can eat the processed foods with no nutritional value, full of chemicals, and then wash it down with carbonated beverage of your choice. But the silver bullet that Big Pharma holds out as the quick fix is not real and you will never gain the health you could have had with due diligence to your food choices today.
Psychiatric Drug Scam
Constitutional Attorney Jonathan Emord on the link between psychiatric drugs and school shootings and why there should be a federal investigation!
____________________________
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A CURE MADE BY DRUGS!
- All medicine has side effects and is approved based upon percentages of benefit over detriment.
- ALL drugs have the potential of death to the recipient
- All drugs do not promote an enhancement of health but trick the body into performing a function in a different manner than normal.
- Pain medications do not cure but enable in many cases the recipient to function and the body cures itself when given the right nutrients.
---------------------------------------
HOW DO PAIN MEDS WORK?
When part of your body is injured, special nerve endings send pain messages back to your brain. Pain killing drugs interfere with these messages, either at the site of the injury, in the spinal cord or in the brain itself.
Psychiatric Drug Scam
Constitutional Attorney Jonathan Emord on the link between psychiatric drugs and school shootings and why there should be a federal investigation!
____________________________
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A CURE MADE BY DRUGS!
- All medicine has side effects and is approved based upon percentages of benefit over detriment.
- ALL drugs have the potential of death to the recipient
- All drugs do not promote an enhancement of health but trick the body into performing a function in a different manner than normal.
- Pain medications do not cure but enable in many cases the recipient to function and the body cures itself when given the right nutrients.
---------------------------------------
HOW DO PAIN MEDS WORK?
When part of your body is injured, special nerve endings send pain messages back to your brain. Pain killing drugs interfere with these messages, either at the site of the injury, in the spinal cord or in the brain itself.
Pharma's False Narrative
This Documents the trend that Thomas Edison was referring to, as more attention was being paid to nutrients and water quality, Infectious Disease deaths fell 85-90%. This was before Vaccines and even those diseases without vaccines followed the same trend.
Big Pharma: science of lies
How Big Pharma Lies to Doctors about Medicine you are taking
Following doctor’s orders has become synonymous with danger. Death by medicine flourishes because deceit, not science, governs a doctor’s prescribing habits.
Big Pharma: Organized Crime
Dr.Gøtzsche has been critical of screening for breast cancer using mammography, arguing that it cannot be justified; His critique stems from a meta-analysis he did on mammography screening studies and published as Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? in The Lancet in 2000. In it he discarded 6 out of 8 studies arguing their randomization was inadequate.
America has the Highest Death rates
By giving the mother, before pregnancy, good levels of supplementation with minerals, vitamins & herbs and eating right 4 your blood type, we can prevent mumps, measles, rubella & most diseases. Vaccinations gives you no immunity & vaccinations have dangerous chemical poisons.
Shocking Lies of Big Pharma
Even though guilt for cover-ups, bribery and corruption of every kind has been positively proven, for many drug companies, there has never yet been any single individual been made to face the full wrath of the law that you and i would face should we commit the same type of crime in other arenas – no convictions, no prison terms – truly amazing – but not surprising when you get to understand the amount of cash that’s involved in the pharmaceutical industry..!
Big Pharma Poisoning Our Food
Monsanto will do anything to bury this story… and as of right now, it’s working. Not a single mainstream media outlet has covered this appalling new report that shows millions of people being poisoned by a chemical that does not belong in our food. This chemical is ending up in processed foods like Cheerios, Ritz Crackers, and Oreos and being consumed by humans across the world.
Big Pharma Lies on Display
How does Big Pharma convince nearly all doctors and patients that everyone must take a statin medication?
First, they scare the public into believing that if you don’t, you’ll have a heart attack.
Next, they manipulate statistics to convince everyone that statins are beneficial.
HIPAA Laws a big lie
They sold the American people on the lie that HIPAA enhanced the protection of their medical information was an acting job that warrants an Academy Award!
Drugs Polluting the Environment
Bugs are being exposed to daily doses of some drugs, such as antidepressants, that are up to half of those prescribed to humans. Published in the scientific journal Nature Communications, the study adds to growing evidence that the pharmaceutical industry is having a dangerous impact on food chains, water supplies, and the environment.
Dr Rath Exposes the Biggest Fraud
Instructional Video on heart disease on the first half of video and Cancer on the second Half. A good description of anatomy features of the body Systems
Cholesterol Medications
CHOLESTEROL MEDICATIONS (Statins), also do not straighten out the bodily functions but tweak the liver.
Study finds the chemical war against cholesterol using statin drugs was justified through statistical deception and the cover up of over 300 adverse health effects documented in the biomedical literature.
Let food be Your medicine
And Your Medicine be your Food
Let Food Be Your Medicine and Medicine Be Your Food
by Siegfried Gursche, MH
Isn’t it absurd that we call the modalities of natural healing "alternative medicine"? Obviously, "alternative" refers to something other than the accepted or the standard. The opposite to "alternative medicine" is what we now call orthodox or allopathic medicine, which then makes it the standard.
This really irks me. For 2,200 years until 1805, medicine was practiced exclusively according to the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates (460-377 BC), the founding father of natural medicine. He taught that the first and foremost principle of medicine must be to respect nature’s healing forces, which inhabit each living organism. Hippocrates considered illness a natural phenomenon that forced people to discover the imbalances in their health. He strongly believed in good food and related the course of any ailment to poor nutrition and bad eating habits. He stressed, "Let food be your medicine and medicine be your food"–advice that, to this day, has not lost its validity.
I mention the year 1805 because in that year in the small town of Einbeck, where I went to school and enrolled in my apprenticeship, German pharmacist Friedrich Wilhelm Serturner (1783-1841) discovered morphine, named after Morpheus, the god of dreams. Morphine is the bitter, white crystalline found in opium, the milky sap of the unripe poppy. This was the first time, and a significant moment in pharmaceutical history, that a single potent ingredient, an alkaloid, was isolated.
Sertruner was celebrated "freeman of the city," and to this day his pharmacy and discovery are subjects of school projects for students of Einbeck. Hence, the awakening of my desire to become a pharmacist, which, however, never materialized due to unfavorable circumstances during the war and thereafter. Instead, I chose natural health as my profession and my passion.
Ever since morphine was isolated, pharmacists and scientists all over the world turned their backs on the natural healing effects of the synergistic complex of herbs, instead concentrating on finding that magical single ingredient hidden within the plant.
Out of this initial success of isolating single active agents grew today’s mighty phytochemical and chemo-therapeutical industry. Scientists found it easier to work with chemicals, and inherent side-effects of administering single substances were ignored or downplayed. With its financial power, the pharmaceutical industry soon gained control over modern medicine. The use of drugs in treating ailments is taught at universities, and doctors must adhere to this doctrine once in practice. It is actually a crime for them to prescribe natural substances such as herbs or vitamins.
If they do, the College of Physicians and Surgeons will accuse them of unprofessional conduct and cancel their licenses.
Meanwhile, we are observing a renaissance, a revival of herbal medicine. Scientists are discovering that not only herbs, but also foods contain synergistic groups of ingredients that provide medicinal benefit. These groups are referred to as "secondary ingredients" because previously we believed they were of lesser value. Their action couldn’t be explained, though considered to be important. These ingredients include, among many others, carotenoids, flavonoids, phenols, estrogens and enzyme inhibitors. The Europeans have coined a fancy name for them, phytochemicals, which means "plant-based."
Almost daily we hear of new miraculous benefits of one of those phytochemicals discovered in herbs and food. Pigments or colouring agents are now known to be of benefit in the treatment of cancer, especially lycopene from tomatoes and beets. Now we truly can relate to what Hippocrates proclaimed: Let food be your medicine and medicine be your food.
About the Author
Siegfried Gursche is the founder of Alive Publishing Group Inc. Respected as a pioneer of the Canadian health food industry since 1954, he continues to educate and inspire people through book and magazine publishing.
The illusion called medical journalism:
The Deep Secret
By Jon Rappoport
---Some of the greatest illusions are sitting out in the open. They are bypassed for two reasons. People refuse to believe they are illusions, despite the abundant evidence; and the professionals dedicated to upholding the illusions continue their work as if nothing at all has been exposed.
Medical journalists in the mainstream rely completely on studies published in prestigious journals.
This is the rock. This is the science.
This is also the source of doctors' authoritarian and arrogant advice to patients.
"Studies show..."
Well, that wraps it up. Nothing else to prove. The studies in the journals are the final word.
Medical reporters base their entire careers on these published reports.
But what if higher authorities contradicted all these studies? What if they scrutinized more studies than any reporter or doctor possibly could...and came to a shocking and opposite conclusion?
This very thing has happened. And the conclusions have been published. But medical reporters ignore them and go their merry way, as if a vast pillar of modern medicine is still intact...when it isn't, when it has been decimated.
Buckle up.
Let us begin with a statement made by Dr. Marcia Angell, the former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, perhaps the most prestigious medical journal in the world---a journal that routinely vets and prints thousands of medical studies:
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." -Marcia Angell, MD, The New York Review of Books, January 15, 2009
You might want to read that statement several times, to savor its full impact. Then proceed to this next one, penned by the editor of The Lancet, another elite and time-honored medical journal that publishes medical studies:
Richard Horton, editor-in-chief, The Lancet, in The Lancet, 11 April, 2015, Vol 385, "Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma?"
"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness...
"The apparent endemicity of bad research behavior is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviors. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of 'significance' pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale...Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent..."
Still standing? Here are several more statements. They are devastating.
The NY Review of Books (May 12, 2011), Helen Epstein, "Flu Warning: Beware the Drug Companies":
"Six years ago, John Ioannidis, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece, found that nearly half of published articles in scientific journals contained findings that were false, in the sense that independent researchers couldn't replicate them. The problem is particularly widespread in medical research, where peer-reviewed articles in medical journals can be crucial in influencing multimillion- and sometimes multibillion-dollar spending decisions. It would be surprising if conflicts of interest did not sometimes compromise editorial neutrality, and in the case of medical research, the sources of bias are obvious. Most medical journals receive half or more of their income from pharmaceutical company advertising and reprint orders, and dozens of others [journals] are owned by companies like Wolters Kluwer, a medical publisher that also provides marketing services to the pharmaceutical industry."
Here's another quote from the same article:
"The FDA also relies increasingly upon fees and other payments from the pharmaceutical companies whose products the agency is supposed to regulate. This could contribute to the growing number of scandals in which the dangers of widely prescribed drugs have been discovered too late. Last year, GlaxoSmithKline's diabetes drug Avandia was linked to thousands of heart attacks, and earlier in the decade, the company's antidepressant Paxil was discovered to exacerbate the risk of suicide in young people. Merck's painkiller Vioxx was also linked to thousands of heart disease deaths. In each case, the scientific literature gave little hint of these dangers. The companies have agreed to pay settlements in class action lawsuits amounting to far less than the profits the drugs earned on the market. These precedents could be creating incentives for reduced vigilance concerning the side effects of prescription drugs in general."
Also from the NY Review of Books, here are two more quotes from Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of The New England Journal of Medicine ("Drug Companies and Doctors: A Story of Corruption"):
"Consider the clinical trials by which drugs are tested in human subjects. Before a new drug can enter the market, its manufacturer must sponsor clinical trials to show the Food and Drug Administration that the drug is safe and effective, usually as compared with a placebo or dummy pill. The results of all the (there may be many) are submitted to the FDA, and if one or two trials are positive-that is, they show effectiveness without serious risk-the drug is usually approved, even if all the other trials are negative."
Here is another Angell statement:
"In view of this control and the conflicts of interest that permeate the enterprise, it is not surprising that industry-sponsored trials published in medical journals consistently favor sponsors' drugs-largely because negative results are not published, positive results are repeatedly published in slightly different forms, and a positive spin is put on even negative results. A review of seventy-four clinical trials of antidepressants, for example, found that thirty-seven of thirty-eight positive studies were published. But of the thirty-six negative studies, thirty-three were either not published or published in a form that conveyed a positive outcome."
If you have the patience to read and re-read these statements, you'll see they are marking out a scandal of scandals---the entirety of medical literature is a pipeline for deep fraud.
Citing with confidence a study on a drug, for example, would carry no more weight than an article about a celebrity in a gossip rag.
But medical reporters must pretend their sources are correct. It's their job. If they reject published studies, they have nothing left---except to expose the giant scandal I'm outlining in this article. Biting the hand that feeds them would put them out of work. They'd end up writing about picnics for some local paper---if they were lucky.
However, that's not my problem or yours. It's theirs. They chose their profession.
We can settle on the truth. We can even spread it.
Why not?
Jon Rappoport - Investigative Reporter